“No Return” Best Interest Finding
In addition to deciding the dependency issues, the court must find that it is not in the child’s best interest to return to the child’s or parent’s previous country of nationality or last habitual residence. The court uses the same best interest factors and analysis under state law that it used in making the first two findings — dependency and the nonviability of being reunited with one or both parents on account of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or a similar basis — to make the “no return” finding.
The standards for making best interests determinations is generally set by statute and accordingly varies by state. A compendium of best interest statutes is here.
There are a wide range of factors the court will take into account that are not related to the abuse/abandonment. These include alternative caregivers; family/friend support systems; access to medical, both physical and mental; access to education; protection and security; ability to exercise basic freedoms; and ability to have the child’s identity recognized and protected. Identity includes sex, sexual orientation, national origin, religious and cultural beliefs, cultural identity and personality.
In the “no return” context, accessing what will happen to the child depends on the facts of her case set in the context of the conditions in the home country. An advocate must understand country conditions in order to draw out the child’s story and prepare a persuasive case overall. Providing the court with evidence of country conditions is also critical because objective evidence can lend credibility to the client’s story and in some cases corroborate it. For example, evidence of the lack of protection and security in a certain country can help the court understand the many difficulties the child would face if they were forced to return to their country of nationality or last residence.
This is a library of curated publications that discuss country conditions. Additional publications can be found here.
The goal of the Predicate Order Resource Center and this page is to provide advocates with easy access to publications and other resources to be used as a starting place for research and further investigation. It is not a substitute for independent thought, research and, if applicable, obtaining legal advice.
The goal of the Predicate Order Resource Center and this page is to provide advocates with easy access to publications and other resources to be used as a starting place for research and further investigation. It is not a substitute for independent thought, research and, if applicable, obtaining legal advice.